Multiple Myeloma - Survival Rate Statistics by Hospital
  • Home
  • Higher Risk Myeloma
  • Myeloma Blog
  • Myeloma Specialists Listing
  • Doctor Submissions
  • Contact Us

Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer Improves Survival Rates -  Why Not Multiple Myeloma?

2/17/2015

2 Comments

 
Dr. Irene Ghobrial of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute was on the Feb 12th Cure Panel and her broadcast was exceptional, however I want to talk of one MAJOR takeaway I had from the program.  If you missed it you can hear a rebroadcast if you CLICK HERE.  Her point was simple, straight forward, logical, and impossible to argue against that Multiple Myeloma is the only cancer where we wait for it to metastasize and show organ, bone damage, or anemia  before we begin treatment. 

She provides examples  of successes in breast cancer and  colon cancer where we do massive screening and when we find the cancer, it is treated.  DCIS or
ductal carcinoma in situ is the most common form of breast cancer, and if found during a yearly mammogram the growth will be removed with a 100% 5 year survival rate; however if it is caught after metastasis or Stage 4 the 5 year survival is just 22%.  For Smoldering Myeloma, which is an early diagnosis for myeloma, the Entire Myeloma Specialist community used the philosophy of "Watch and Wait".  Dr. Ghobrial says many of her patients call this "Watch and Worry!", and as a result Dr. Ghobrial is on a mission to bring the same success to myeloma that we find in breast and colon cancer. 

She and many other specialists are coming to the conclusion that screening, early diagnosis, and early treatment is the future of myeloma treatment.  There are a number of steps that must be taken to reach this goal.  Those steps are as follows:

Step 1 - We need to determine which MGUS and smoldering patients will progress to active myeloma and are candidates for early treatment.  Genetic testing may be the key to this step.  For example just 10% of smoldering patients will progress to full blown myeloma, whereas 50% of high risk smoldering patients will progress.  In MGUS only 1% of patients will progress, but some may have a genetic profile which indicates a higher likelihood of progression.

Step 2 -  We need to prove early treatment will result in improved Overall Survival.  A trial by Dr. San Miguel of the Spanish group conducted a trial for high risk smoldering myeloma and he stated the results were as follows,

Dr. San Miguel was the senior investigator on a phase III trial in which patients were randomized to receive lenalidomide and dexamethasone or observation, the latter being the usual standard of care for individuals who have an increase of plasma cells in the bone marrow that produce the monoclonal immunoglobulin (IgG), but do not have any myeloma symptoms.

San Miguel outlined the prognostic factors that allowed the research team to segment out the high-risk group, which included plasma cell bone marrow infiltration, IgG levels, and urinary protein levels.

“You want to give the patient what is needed, and nothing more than is needed,” San Miguel said.

This approach produced improved 3-year survival rates among the high-risk patients identified and treated by the Spanish team during the study; 94% of those who were treated were still alive at 5 years, compared with 80% in the untreated group - See more at: http://www.onclive.com/conference-coverage/ASH-2014/Multiple-Myeloma-Advances-Noted-Hematologist-Envisions-Big-Changes-in-Treatment-Paradigms#sthash.uYifhyum.dpuf

You have a 6% chance of dying in 5 years if you are treated, and a 20% chance of dying in 5 years if you are not treated during the smoldering phase of the disease.  You are therefore more than 3 times more likely to die if not treated.  Average life expectancy for a patient with symptomatic high risk disease is just 2 years.   More trials are in the works, however this is some very compelling evidence for early treatment. 

Step 3 -  We have simple blood tests for the measurement of M protein and a more sophisticated test called the light chain test.  Both of these tests together cost less than a mammogram or colonoscopy.
  However, these tests are not conducted during a normal physical and blood panel.  Dana Farber will be establishing a clinical trial to conduct screening on a large scale to determine if screening, genetic testing, and early treatment can be a game changer like it has with breast and colon cancer.  With talent like Dr. Ghobrial on Dana Farber's team, I feel it is not a question of if, but a question of when. 

In my opinion Dr. Ghobrial is a SUPERSCIENTIST, and a summary of her background is as noted below.


Picture

Picture
DR. GHOBRIAL SUPERSCIENTIST
Dr. Ghobrial is an Associate Professor of Medicine at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at the Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts. She is a physician Scientist who specializes in the field of Multiple Myeloma and Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia specifically in the precursor conditions of MGUS and Smoldering Myeloma. Dr. Ghobrial received her MD in 1995 from Cairo University School of Medicine, Egypt. She completed her Internal Medicine training at Wayne State University, Mich., and her Hematology/Oncology subspecialty training at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Minn. She is on many Dana-Farber and ASH committees.

She reviews abstracts for the American Association of Cancer Research and top publications such as Blood, Lancet, and the Journal of Clinical Oncology just to name a few. She’s on the editorial board of the American Journal of Blood Research. Dr. Ghobrial reviews grants for the NIH, the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and the MMRF and has won numerous awards including a Dana-Farber Clinical Investigator Award, the Robert Kyle Award for her work in Waldenstrom and more. She particularly focuses on the role of the malignant bone marrow niche in disease progression from early precursor conditions like MGUS/smoldering myeloma to active myeloma.

Dr. Ghobrial and her lab examines how myeloma uses a process of cell dissemination to determine biological changes that occure during progression in myeloma. She seeks to understand that progression process from inactive to an active state. In addition, her laboratory research data has been rapidly translated to innovative investigator-initiated clinical trials. This lab has conducted over ten phase I and II clinical trials. Their studies on myeloma cell trafficking have been translated to the first chemosensitization trials in patients with Myeloma.

In addition, she is the co-leader of the first consortium of clinical trials for blood cancers in collaboration with the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society to form the Blood Cancer Research Partnership, a consortium of 11 community oncology sites coordinated by Dana-Farber. She has initiated a new clinic for the Prevention of Progression in Blood Cancers where patients with precursor conditions such as MGUS, early MDS and early CLL will be monitored before disease progression to see how the clonal evolution happens during disease progression. She just joined the MCRI as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board. Sounds like she is a SUPERSCIENTIST.


Good luck and may God Bless your Cancer Journey.   For more information on multiple myeloma survival rates and treatments CLICK HERE and you can follow me on twitter at: https://twitter.com/grpetersen1

2 Comments
Dean Preston
3/17/2017 03:52:05 pm

This is a great post! Since being diagnosed in January, my journey has taken me from Denver to Little Rock and possibly Boston, to see Dr. Ghobrial.

She has personally communicated with me, even though I came to Little Rock first. After the testing at Little Rock, they elected to do monthly blood draws and do biopsies/MRI's every three months.

Little Rock places me at Low Risk, even though I am type IgA and two of my abnormal FISH results are dup(1q21) and the t(4; 14).

With those results, Dr. Ghobrial's team places me at High Risk and wants to place me in the Trial for High Risk.

As a patient, this is very confusing and makes it tough to decide which route to go. It would be nice if the true Myeloma Specialists were on the same page when it came to assigning risk.

With that in mind, the only thing keeping me from leaving for Boston is the lack of insurance coverage, as it would require a year of visits and tests as I go through the trial.

I sure do love the blog posts on this site, though, and continue to fight the good fight, day by day.

Reply
Gary Petersen link
3/19/2017 09:25:12 am

Dean, you have obviously done your myeloma homework! UAMS uses the GEP to determine risk, and sometimes they chose this over the FISH results. I am thinking the best bet for anyone to beat this disease is to hit it as early as possible and reach MRD negative status. Dr. Ghorbrial is the champion of early treatment, and if you are on clinical trial most of the costs should be covered by the clinical trial. If your myeloma becomes full blown then UAMS is the one who has a history of what they say is a 50% cure rate. If I were in your shows right now I think I would pursue the Clinical Trial at Dana Farber, and the KRDD, Transplant, KRD trail would be my fist chose. But that is me, an older frail patient 75+ might just watch. When and if it becomes active, most myeloma specialists can give a GEP low risk patient 10+ years. Good luck and God Bless your myeloma journey/Gary

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Gary R. Petersen
    [email protected]
    CLICK HERE for my myeloma journey

    ©2012 All Rights Reserved

    Categories

    All

    Archives

    January 2025
    August 2023
    March 2023
    October 2022
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012

    RSS Feed

Web Hosting by iPage